[net.audio] Opinions on Carver?

mat (12/16/82)

Carver Corpopation (ie. Bob Carver) has come out with some nifty-looking
and expensive boxes in the last couple of years.  I've got his 201W/chan.
amp and am quite pleased with it, except that the power supply buzzes a
little (into the air, NOT into the line).  I've heard the demo records for
his Sonic Holography systems, and they are impressive.  I'm strongly
considering buying one of his pre-Amps, although I want to test the
Hologram system out with some disks selected out of my own collection
first.  Does anyone have anything to say about these systems?  Any
great or horrible things??  Yes, I've seen most of the reviews.
ALSO anything on the new Carver tuner? or the new NAD tuner? for that
matter.
	Mail to me at hou5a!mat.  hou5a is on houxz, harpo, and a bundle
	of other BTL machines as well.  I will try to digest and post the
	results, unless you ask otherwise.

burris (12/16/82)

#R:hou5a:-18700:ihlpb:4000024:  0:2055
ihlpb!burris    Dec 16 13:45:00 1982


As you may already know, Bob Carver used to be a design engineer for
Phase Linear, and is a very bright guy. Some of his ideas, I don't
quite agree with but they are no less innovative.

The Carver Holographic preamp does indeed sound unique. It in affect
takes advantage of the psycho-acoustic effect known as imaging in
order to "broaden" the sound such that it seems to exceed the
boundries of the listening area, or even the room. It accomplishes this
by using a matrix circuit which compares the signals in the two
stereo channels and altering the output (not tremendously different
than some of the quad decoders but with only two speakers). For example,
if a sound is destined to come from the left speaker only, the
circuit would recognize this and create a lower amplitude signal in
the right channel which is shifted in phase. This phase shifted
signal, when summed acoustically by your ears, make the sound appear
to come from a direction to the left of the left speaker. When this
process is performed on the entire program, the result is similar to
playing the stereo in a much larger space. I personally have
reservations about this, or any other, system which introduces gross
amplitude and phase distortion into the signal. This is one item
best left up to the buyer.

The Carver reciever was rated by "High Fidelity" as overall one of
the best recievers they have tested. This recievers selling point is
that it has special circuitry which takes over when the FM stereo
signal is too poor. For a detailed explaination you can pick up a
copy of HF at the news stand this month. Basically it synthesizes
the stereo carrier to replace the one recieved from the station.
This produces a "psuedo-stereo" which sounds quite convincing, but
is not the true stereo signal as it was recorded. The primary
consideration here is: if you are on a fringe area of FM stereo
reception, would you rather switch you tuner to mono or would you
prefer to recieve a relatively convincing simulated stereo signal.

Dave Burris
ihlpb!burris
BTL - Naperville