[net.audio] why do they call it dust cover?

dbg@ihldt.UUCP (05/23/83)

Someone mentioned earlier that firing your zerostat on the
dust cover periodically will keep harmful static charge down.
That sounds like a reasonable thing to try -- I'll have to get
one.  Until then I'll leave it open.  As for the harmful dust
that gets sucked onto the album while it spins, (an interesting
notion -- I think I'll try some smoke and light tricks to
check it out.) I'm sure everyone out there washes their entire
collection regularly.  I use mild dish soap and warm water.
Meanwhile, for those who close the "static charger" on their 
table, you may have a surprise one of these days.  Fear not.  
The queuing mechanism is not stuck.

			ihldt!dbg

mat@hou5e.UUCP (05/23/83)

My understanding about dust covers and static and whatnot is that the
static charge that accumulates on a record comes from two sources -
contact with the stylus and contact of the highly modulated and sharp-edged
groove with the air.  If this is the case, then one would ALWAYS want to keep
the dust cover down while playing, since the record acts almost like
a magnet for dust.  Am I off the wall?
					Mark Terribile
					hou5e!mat