rsk@pucc-h (Rich Kulawiec) (09/13/84)
Opening: Queen's Indian
White: Garri Kasparov
Black: Anatoly Karpov
1 P-Q4 N-KB3
2 P-QB4 P-K3
3 N-KB3 P-QN3
4 P-KN3 B-N2
5 B-N2 B-K2
6 O-O O-O
7 P-Q5 PxP
8 N-R4 P-B3
9 PxP NxP
10 N-B5 N-B2
11 N-B3 P-Q4
12 P-K4 B-B3
13 B-B4 B-B1
14 P-KN4 QN-R3
15 R-B1 B-Q2
16 Q-Q2 N-B4
17 P-K5 B-K2
18 NxB ch QxN
19 B-N5 Q-K3
20 P-KR3 Q-N3
21 P-B4 P-B3
22 PxP PxP
23 B-R4 P-B4
24 P-N4 PxP
25 PxP N-Q6
26 R-B3 NxR
27 P-B5 Q-N2
28 QxN QR-K1
29 Q-Q2 P-Q5
30 N-K2 N-Q4
31 NxP K-R1
32 P-KN5 R-K5
33 B-B2 Q-K4
34 R-KN3 R-B5
35 P-B6 B-K1
36 P-N5 P-B4
37 N-B6 Q-R8 ch
38 B-B1 R-B4
39 P-N6 BxP
40 RxB R4xP
Adjourned
--
---Rsk
UUCP: { decvax, icalqa, ihnp4, inuxc, sequent, uiucdcs } !pur-ee!rsk
{ decwrl, hplabs, icase, psuvax1, siemens, ucbvax } !purdue!rsk
Not fade away...rsk@pucc-h (Rich Kulawiec) (09/15/84)
Opening: Queen's Indian
White: Garri Kasparov
Black: Anatoly Karpov
41 RxR QxR
42 Q-K1 R-N1 ch
43 K-R2 Q-B5 ch
44 B-N3 RxB
45 QxR QxB
46 Q-N8 ch K-N2
47 Q-N3 ch
Drawn
--
---Rsk
UUCP: { decvax, icalqa, ihnp4, inuxc, sequent, uiucdcs } !pur-ee!rsk
{ decwrl, hplabs, icase, psuvax1, siemens, ucbvax } !purdue!rsk
Not fade away...roy@gitpyr.UUCP (Roy J. Mongiovi) (09/16/84)
Do we really need to see each game in algebraic *and* descriptive?
--
Roy J. Mongiovi. Office of Computing Services.
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta GA 30332
Phone: (404) 894-6163, (404) 894-4660 [messages]
...!{akgua,allegra,amd,hplabs,ihnp4,masscomp,ut-ngp}!gatech!gitpyr!roy
...!{rlgvax,sb1,uf-cgrl,unmvax,ut-sally}!gatech!gitpyr!royqwerty@drutx.UUCP (09/20/84)
Considering the low traffic on this group, I don't see what it hurts. Also, as a person who is having one h*ll of a time reading the newer notation, I appreciate having both.
leet@azure.UUCP (Lee Thomas) (09/21/84)
<>
I've been following the championship matches so kindly posted here
by Ken Thompson and Rich Kulawiec (*thank you*, gentlemen) in *both*
algebraic and descriptive, because I don't know algebraic.
Do you algebraists *really* want to deprive me (and others ...
hello, out there ...) of a very convenient way to learn the
*RIGHT* way ( :-) :-) :-) ) for notation?
Seriously, I prefer algebraic, but I don't know it well enough to
rely on it. *Thanks to Rich*, I'm improving.
----------
Lee ("Shoot if you must this old gray head, ...") Thomas
tektronix!azure!ebony!leet
Tektronix, Beaverton, ORroy@gitpyr.UUCP (Roy J. Mongiovi) (09/22/84)
> Do you algebraists *really* want to deprive me (and others ... > hello, out there ...) of a very convenient way to learn the > *RIGHT* way ( :-) :-) :-) ) for notation? > > Seriously, I prefer algebraic, but I don't know it well enough to > rely on it. *Thanks to Rich*, I'm improving. Actually, being forced to read the games in algebraic would probably be the best way to learn. Since the U.S. is really the only hold-out in the "official" conversion to algebraic (the USCF has postponed the date a couple of times, I believe), we all really ought to make the effort to learn. I'm told that chess book are considerable inflated in price because two versions have to be made, one algebraic for most of the world, one english descriptive for the U.S. And hey, I'm as cheap as the next guy.... -- Roy J. Mongiovi. Office of Computing Services. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta GA 30332 Phone: (404) 894-6163, (404) 894-4660 [messages] ...!{akgua,allegra,amd,hplabs,ihnp4,masscomp,ut-ngp}!gatech!gitpyr!roy ...!{rlgvax,sb1,uf-cgrl,unmvax,ut-sally}!gatech!gitpyr!roy