gam@proper.UUCP (Gordon Moffett) (05/02/84)
# I agree. I am OPPOSED (that's a big N-O) to net.music.classical, but net.classical sounds like a good idea only because we would have so much fun trying to figure out what belongs there ...
jj@rabbit.UUCP (05/03/84)
Hey, folks, wake up. Net.music.classical is here, fairly bursting with articles on performances thereof, recordings of, and other issues. Those of you who don't want to create it are welcome to do <shift> u, and you won't have to see it. If you wish to continue cluttering up the net with a moot point, especially one where the evidence is against you, please do so in net.flame, where it belongs. Net.audio is for AUDIO <flaming, it seems> discussion, not for newsgroup discussions. Net.music is for MUSIC discussions, not for newsgroup discussions. Net.news.group is for discussing groups that DON'T exist yet, net.music.classical DOES. ENOUGH!!!!! Get it OUT of net.audio! From the flaming keyboard (please notice the last newsgroup included in this note) of: -- TEDDY BEARS ARE MUCH NICER THAN PEOPLE--HUG YOURS, I DO! (Instead of spa, we'll drink brown ale, and pay the reckoning on the nail, ...) (allegra,harpo,ulysses)!rabbit!jj