shauns@vice.UUCP (Shaun Simpkins) (05/16/84)
Sorry, but whatever Nak chooses to release, it won't have dbx. Nak long ago said it prefers Dolby C or its own version of Dolby C, High-Com II, to dbx. I believe one of the reasons they cited was unacceptable noise level pumping ("breathing") which is mostly eliminated by the former systems' two-band NR scheme. The other may be price, at least at the time Nak decided. dbx now uses a single chip for its vca and detection circuitry. 3-4 years ago dbx was a large amount of discrete components, about 50-80 per channel. However, dolby C can apparently be made from the appropriate cascading of 2 readily available dolby B chips plus a small amount of external parts, which reduces mfg changeover costs. The wandering squash, -- Shaun Simpkins uucp: {ucbvax,decvax,chico,pur-ee,cbosg,ihnss}!teklabs!tekcad!vice!shauns CSnet: shauns@tek ARPAnet:shauns.tek@rand-relay