[net.audio] Carver vs Levinson, etc

keller@uicsl.UUCP (07/14/84)

#N:uicsl:21100003:000:641
uicsl!keller    Jul 13 21:52:00 1984

(Nobody told me there'd be days like these.)

Now on to the question of the week:

If Bob Carver can make his amps sound just like a Levinson ML-9(model?)
why not buy a Carver amp. (Hell, why not buy it even if it doesn't match
the ML-9!)

OK, enough already! If you have $30,000 to spend on a stereo and don't
like analytical methods why bother impoverished EE's like myself?

I would rather discuss
something like what dithering does to the signal-to-noise ratio and the
relationship between sampling frequency, antialiasing filters, and how
close you can get to realizing the Nyquist sample rate.

-Shaun Keller (What was that outburst?)

pmr@drutx.UUCP (07/16/84)

Not everyone on the net is a EE (thank God :-).  I enjoy subjective
discussion.

		Yours for higher fidelity,
		Phil Rastocny
		AT&T-ISL
		..!drutx!pmr

rcd@opus.UUCP (Dick Dunn) (07/19/84)

>Not everyone on the net is a EE (thank God :-).  I enjoy subjective
>discussion.

And not everyone on the net is a GE (thank God :-).  I enjoy objective
discussion as well as subjective discussion.  Maybe I just deal better with
discussing when I know that there's a possibility of facts behind the
discussion.
-- 
Dick Dunn	{hao,ucbvax,allegra}!nbires!rcd		(303)444-5710 x3086
	...I'm not cynical - just experienced.