wjm@whuxl.UUCP (MITCHELL) (08/07/84)
A reply to Doug Hosking, which I'm posting to the net since I think it is of more general interest. The article that sparked my original reply and Doug's response discussed the use of driver's license numbers as the only reasonable form of ID to mark on audio equipment and appeared in net.audio. Doug, I can certainly understand your predicament - However, what REALLY irks me is the concept of a universal ID card (especially in 1984 of all years), since it makes it easier for Big Brother to watch everything you do. I realize that Europeans accept the concept of a government issued ID, but this is the USA, and Americans have a long tradition (thank goodness) of opposing such police state tactics. A driver's license should serve only ONE purpose, that of stating that the bearer is qualified to operate a motor vehicle of the appropriate class, not be used as a universal ID. I'll be glad to provide one of several generally accepted ID cards to banks, stores, etc on request (major credit cards, employer ID, library card, ham radio license, PE license, among others) - its not that I don't recognize the need for ID with all the bum checks, etc floating around, its just that I'd rather each group issue its own ID and accept SEVERAL different ID cards. Needless to say, I also object to the use of the SSN for any purpose other than Social Security accounting. (OK, I'll grant the IRS the right to use it for Federal income tax purposes under a grandfather clause.) Regards, Bill Mitchell (whuxl!wjm)