[net.audio] dbx vs. Dolby B/C

jlo@ucbvax.ARPA (Jeff Lo) (11/30/84)

<>

I am currently looking to add a cassette deck to my system which
consists of a Yamaha R-70 reciever, Yamaha CD-2, a Yamaha turntable
and Polk Audio 5B speakers and am looking for opinions about the
merits of dbx over Dolby B or C. Is the noise reduction that much 
better that I would notice it if I recorded a CD? In particular I
am looking at the Yamaha K-1000 cassette deck. Would I be better off
with this deck with dbx or would perhaps something like a
Nakamichi in the same price range (~$600) with Dolby be better.
Please respond to this account, if there is sufficient interest
I will summarize to the net. Thanks!

				Jeff Lo
				UUCP: ..!ucbvax!jlo
				ARPA: jlo@ucbvax.ARPA
				CSNET: jlo%ucbvax@csnet-relay

herbie@watdcsu.UUCP (Herb Chong, Computing Services) (12/01/84)

If you plan to tape CD's with your tape deck, then dbx is the only
suitable noise reduction system, especially if you are into classical
music.  Dolby B is adequate only for ordinary pressings, while Dolby C
is marginal for audiophile pressings.  I have a Telefunken HighCom unit
(somewhat similar to dbx) and it is adequate for my audiophile pressings,
but it would be noticeable when recording CD's.  Yamaha's K-1000 deck is
an excellent deck and provides the kind of headroom with metal tape that
you need to get all that is potentially possible with cassette tape.

-- 
Herb Chong...

I'm user-friendly -- I don't byte, I nybble....

UUCP:  {decvax|utzoo|ihnp4|allegra|clyde}!watmath!watdcsu!herbie
CSNET: herbie%watdcsu@waterloo.csnet
ARPA:  herbie%watdcsu%waterloo.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa
NETNORTH, BITNET: herbie@watdcs, herbie@watdcsu
POST:  Department of Computing Services
       University of Waterloo  
       Waterloo, ON
       N2L 3G1 (519)885-1211 x3524

gregr@tekig1.UUCP (Greg Rogers) (12/04/84)

I don't think dBx is the "only suitable noise reduction system for tape" as
stated.  I own a dBx unit and have seldom used it because I find the breathing
very objectionable as I've indicated several times before on the net.  There
is nothing wrong with my dBx unit, this is very normal and is simply a designed
in side effect.  The dBx home units are single band, 2:1 companders.  The single
band creates a problem whenever the program material consists of narrow 
frequency band information, such as a solo instrument.  The program material is
too narrow to mask the tape noise which then rises and falls with the solo
instrument output.  This effect is simply known as breathing.  Note that 
professional compander systems like Dolby A split the frequency spectrum into
multiple bands (4 for Dolby A).  This allows the signal to rise in one band 
without allowing the noise to rise in another band.  So I am afraid for most
classical music the home dBx units are unacceptable for me.

Now the good news.  Sanyo makes (or did) a home noise reduction unit called
Sanyo Super D.  The Sanyo Plus N55 is a simultaneous record/play (4 channels)
unit that is also a 2:1 compander BUT has TWO frequency bands.  The two 
bands seem to solve most of the breathing problems of the single band units.
I wouldn't have thought of Sanyo for this type of equipment but this is a very
nice unit that is a dramatic improvement over my dBx unit.  The N55 is about
the same price as a dBx 224 (maybe $50-$100 more retail) but I'm not sure if
they are still selling them.  I can't emphasize enough how much better the
Sanyo unit is and since I got both of them I have no reason to care which
is better.  Oh the best news, I got the Sanyo unit for $35 (new) last summer
when a local high volume discount stereo store unloaded them along with other
Sanyo amps and stuff.  I don't think they even knew what they really were.

				Greg Rogers
				Tektronix

ackersviller@watmath.UUCP (Paul Ackersviller) (12/05/84)

I have both an outboard dbx unit and a deck equipped with Dolby B & C,
and I tend to agree with the Greg Taylor that breathing from dbx is
often objectionable - I use mine only for music with a wide dynamic
range, i.e. orchesral.  Interestingly, I notice that breathing is far
less of a problem with dbx discs.  Unfortunately though, not that many 
were ever released and I've heard that they're being discontinued.

Dolby C seems to be adequate for music with a narrow enough dynamic
range to fit with it.  It's certainly a big improvement over Dolby B
in terms of tape hiss.  Dolby has the added advantage of having a
certain degree of compatibility for playback without decoding.
This is useful for car and portable players; dbx decoders for these
are rare (and expensive).

I'm wondering if the addition of Dolby HX (for headroom extension - it's
not a noise reduction system) adds considerably to the possible dynamic
range available with Dolby C as it would seem capable of doing.
Is there anyone out there who has experience with it and who would 
like to comment?