[net.audio] CD availability & mixing

jona@clyde.UUCP (Jon Allingham) (07/22/85)

> >...  My own guess is that because popular music is so much less
> >demanding (few quiet passages, less dynamic range), record companies
> >have simply not felt the improvement in sound quality for pop would
> >justify the cost of the scarce digital equipment.
> 
> What you say is true, however I don't think it is the primary reason
> that classical artists have been the first to record digitally.  I
> believe it is primarily due to the way the two styles of music are
> recorded.  In a classical recording session, the microphones are set
> up, the recorder is turned on, then the work is performed.  There is
> minimal editing, and the work can be recorded in two track stereo.
> On a pop album, first a rhythm track is laid down.  Then other
> instruments are added.  The performer might then decide to sing
> harmonies with himself.  By the time the recording is finished, there
> are some 24 tracks to be mixed down to the two track stereo needed to
> cut the master.  Time on a digital console capable of doing the
> mixdown is very expensive, and engineers used to analog are reluctant
> to relearn their craft to suit the new technology.
> 
> Ben Broder

Expensive & different yes, but from what I hear, the things you
can do with a digital editing machine are just amazing and
a whole lot easier. 

I haven't actually seen one of these machines, but I sure would
like to.
-- 
Jon M. Allingham	(201)386-3466	AT&T Bell Laboratories-WH

"Beam me up Scotty, no intelligent life down here!"