manheime@nbs-amrf.UUCP (Ken Manheimer) (07/22/86)
> [...] > the opposite. I'm glad to see that the one-beam people are fighting > back against the three-beam people, however. For a time, I thought the > advertising copywriters were about to establish the superiority of > three beams based merely on the well-known fact that three is a larger > number than one. > -- > ...decwrl!mips!sjc Steve Correll It's just too easy to dismiss a good opportunity for a nasty argument as "advertising hype". To fully weigh the issue you have to consider, on the one hand, that many people find One to inherently have a warmer Presence (ask any theologian). On the other hand, it's clearly irrefutable that one has a square-root rating somewhat lower than three, and so would be more subject to inter-harmovulation impedence mismatchmyassing. Ken. (I almost hate to put these (-:&:-) in. :-)