[net.math] Scales again

philipl@bronze.UUCP (Philip Lantz) (08/03/83)

There is definitely something intrinsically beautiful about octaves, fifths,
etc.; this is NOT an assumption!  It is agreed to by all musicians, and
is explained by physics (which I am about to do, if I can).  There may
be some minor things in here that are not 100% correct for the sake of
simplicity.

A sound made by a musical instrument is a mixture of different frequencies.
The frequency we "hear" is called the fundamental, and is the lowest
frequency.  The rest of the frequencies are integer multiples of this one.
This is caused by the way the sound is made in the instrument:

If the sound is made by a string vibrating, for example, the string can
vibrate with a wavelength of the length of the string, or a wavelength
of half the length of the string, or one-third, etc.  The ends of the
string are both fixed, so it can't sustain a vibration at any
frequency in between.  Actually the string vibrates at all these
frequencies at once, with amplitude of the vibration less at higher
frequencies.

The same effect occurs when the sound is made by air vibrating in a
room.  In this case, the ends are "fixed" by the essentially constant
air pressure in the room (for a pipe with an open end), or by the
constant volume available (for a pipe with a closed end).  There are
more complications dealing with open and closed ends, which I won't go
into, unless I'm asked.

When two notes whose fundamentals are an octave apart are sounded together,
the frequency of the second harmonic of the lower note is the same as the
frequency of the fundamental of the higher note.  The fourth harmonic of
the lower note is the same as the second harmonic of the higher note, and
so on.  There is a high degree of what musicians call consonance; the notes
sound good together.  Non-musicians can hear this, too; it's NOT training.
(By the way, I'm not a musician, but I come from a family full of them.)

When two notes are sounded together that are a perfect fifth apart, the third
harmonic of the tonic is the same as the second harmonic of the fifth; the
sixth harmonic of the tonic is the same as the fourth harmonic of the fifth.
There is less consonance than there was with the octave, but still more than
any other combination of two notes.  The tone sounds good.

When you play two notes a "seventh" apart, none of the harmonics match, until
you get up to such a high frequency that the harmonics are so weak that they
are barely or not audible.  I put seventh in quotes because that term has no
meaning except in connection with a equal-tempered scale; it doesn't correspond
to any pleasing interval.

By the way, I believe this does belong in net.math; music is a VERY mathematical
thing.  I believe net.music is concerned more with performers and recordings,
whereas this discussion is about the mathematical and physical nature of music.

I hope this helps anyone who is confused, but interested.  If there are still
things to be cleared up, let me know by mail, and I'll see if I can help.
(Better yet, though, go to the library.  It's hard to draw charts and diagrams
on a terminal.)

Philip Lantz
tekmdp!bronze!philipl

P.S.  It seems to me there is an explanation of consonance that works for pure
tones, also, (i.e., those with no harmonics present), but I couldn't remember 
it.  Do pure tones exhibit consonance and dissonance, and if so, why?

brucec@orca.UUCP (Bruce Cohen) (08/04/83)

I believe (not positive, bu I don't currently have access to any of my
acoustics or sensory psychology/physiology books), that the reason the
pure tones can be consonant or dissonant is that the ear is not a
linear transducer.  In converting the sound waves to mechanical
movements of the sensory fibers in the inner ear a degree of non-linear
mixing takes place, which generates harmonics (and sum and difference
frequencies) which did not exist in the original sounds.

				Bruce Cohen
				UUCP:	...!teklabs!tekecs!brucec
				CSNET:	tekecs!brucec@tektronix
				ARPA:	tekecs!brucec.tektronix@rand-relay

ajh@sdcsvax.UUCP (Alan Hu) (08/07/83)

First of all, pure sounds do exhibit consonance and dissonance (I can't spell!).
Consider the following:  If you have one source playing sine waves at
440 hz (The A above middle C) and one playing at 441 hz, the sine waves
will drift in and out of phase resulting in beats, one per second.
As the frequencies drift apart, the number of beats increase.  Around
5 beats per second starts sounding really bad.  Now, if one source plays
440 hz and the other plays up one octave at 880 hz, there will be no drifting
in and out of phase; every wave from source 1 matches 2 waves from source 2.
There are no beats and the sound is pleasant.  Similar things happen with
perfect fifths and thirds.

On the subject of overtones, the actual sequence of notes if something like
(I don't have my handy Harvard Dictionary of Music with me.)
c' (I think that's middle C.) 		256 hz (I think that's pretty close.)
c'' (That's one octave up)		512 hz
g''					768 hz
c'''					1024 hz
e'''					1280 hz
g'''					1336 hz  and so on.
						(I don't remeber any more.)
Each frequency is an interger multiple of the original note.
All other notes can be derived from this.  If we let C be 1,
the G an ocatave above the fifth will be 3.  Therefore, the G
which is the fifth above C is 3/2.  Similarly, the E which is
a third above the C is 5/4.

All this garbage applies only to so called "just intonation".
A problem with this system is that intervals of the same size on
the keyboard have different sounds.  For example, C-G is consonant,
but D-A, isn't.  Most instruments are (de-)tuned to "well-tempered"
scales in which the ratio of succesive notes is exactly the same.
Even so, you can perform some simple experments on a piano to illustrate
some of these things.  Silently depress the C above middle C.
Stike middle C loudly.  You can here the upper C very clearly.
Silently hold g-c-e and strike the C two octaves below, loudly.
You can here the chord quite plainly.  You can do lots of other
(not very) interesting experiments like this.

I think I'm getting pedantic, and I'm probably boring you guys/gals/
people/others to death, so I'll stop.

					Alan J. Hu
					...sdcsvax!ajh