ma3751az@unm-cvax.UUCP (04/20/85)
> I think a new group might be a good idea for those of us who > are Infocom adventure fanatics. I, for one, only read net.games > for the requests/hints on the Infocom games. > > Do any of you Zork, Starcross, HHGTTG, Cutthroats, Infidel, Planetfall, > Suspend, Suspect, et. al fans have any opinions??? *** THIS LINE CONTAINS 25% RECOMMENDED DAILY ALLOWANCE OF PHOSPHOR *** I, for one, agree. After reading net.games from the beginning of all those saved on the system, about half of them deal with infocom adventures. Those not interested in them must junk through the articles. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stefan "leach" Chakerian CIS 74365,231 {convex,ucbvax,gatech,csu-cs,anl-mcs,lanl-a}!unmvax!unm-cvax!ma3751az
ggc@myriasb.UUCP (Gilles Chartrand) (04/29/85)
> I think a new group might be a good idea for those of us who > are Infocom adventure fanatics. I, for one, only read net.games > for the requests/hints on the Infocom games. > > Do any of you Zork, Starcross, HHGTTG, Cutthroats, Infidel, Planetfall, > Suspend, Suspect, et. al fans have any opinions??? ========================================================================= My sentiments exactly. The only reason I even look at this newsgroup is to pick up clues for infocom games (currently working on HHGTTG). Gilles ...!ihnp4!alberta!myriasb!ggc
schuetz@via.DEC (Now 33 down, and 67 years to go.) (03/13/86)
Why does anyone want a separate news group anyway? Sure, half the traffic is about infocom games, but the total volume of traffic is very low anyway. If you take away the infocom stuff, why bother with net.games? Volume of mail devoted to a separate topic should be the ONLY consideration for creating a new news group. Leave things alone when they are working. /Chris