[net.games.frp] Thieves Backstab

israel@qantel.UUCP ( Renegade) (08/14/84)

< Imagine having YOUR line here! >

   Look, people, let's be practical about this - a backstab is just that -
a backSTAB.  One does not stab with a sling bullet or any other missile
weapon. The extra damage accruing from a successful backstab attack
is a combination of the thief's knowledge and experience in knowing where
to strike IN ADDITION TO his attacking a surprised victim who is basically
unable to protect himself, allowing the thief to drive his sword deeper
into the wound, thus resulting in more damage. A missile attack does
not permit the thief to drive the weapon deeper into the wound (since
he simply isn't there), and so can only manage normal damage at best - 
barring a critical hit, of course.
   As for assassins, if they attack with surprise, they get an assassination
roll. That's what they're for, dammit! Why attack in thief mode when they
got that going for them? Besides, any assassin who doesn't coat his weapons
with contact poison should be drummed out of the guild (and we all know
what THAT means, don't we?). No assassins don't get extra damage with
surprise missile attacks either, but they do get the assassination
roll. So the smart assassin attacks with poison-coated arrows, which
in a surprise attack, will automatically hit (requiring at least a saving
throw from the victim vs. poison), plus the assassination roll, plus
normal damage if the guy is still alive.
   And the smart thief? He must be physically present behind his victim
to perform a successful backstab, but since he doesn't hit automatically
with surprise, he must be prepared to melee. If he hits, he wants to
make sure he does mucho damage, so he should either use a long sword,
or, if he has magical weapons, one with the highest minimum damage (ie,
most plusses), which improves his chance to hit, and makes sure he
does some worth-while wounding. (It seems to me, based on the DMG description
that a really sneaky thief might conceivably manage to succussfully backstab
somebody with a dancing sword, seeing as the sword is supposed to attack as
the weilder does. In this situation, the thief would not have to be standing
in the immediate vicintity of the victim, although this is the only such
exception that occurs to me.)

From the world of New Orc City

Renegade
ucbvax!dual!qantel!israel

"I'm not worried - I've got a ring of DM control!"

pkh@rabbit.UUCP (Paul Pavlidis) (08/16/84)

I disagree with the statement that a thief only gains multiple damage when using
a pointed, penetrating weapon.  I quote the PH: "Backstabbing is the striking of
a blow from behind, be it with club, dagger, or sword."  The fact that a club
cannot be pushed further into a wound does not mean it cannot cause double or
triple damage when used by a thief.  But this is not my main point.  I see no
reason why the following cannot take place: a thief armed with a sling sees his
victim down the street, facing away from him.  The thief, because he has the 
advantage of surprise, is able to aim with greater care for a vital point.  He
slings, and because of his great skill with the weapon, fells the victim.  Another
note-- what if the thief was using daggers to throw?  These definitely penetrate
and a well timed and aimed throw could go deeper.  The thief does not have the
advantage of double damage when lacking surprise or attacking from the front because
he does not have time to take very careful aim (the thief gets +4 to hit from
behind by the same token).  I must say, though, that the thief will not be
able to use his skills fully, because as said, he is not right there.  He may
get only +3 to hit and not get double damage unless he is above level four--the
details are not important.
	In addition, I also think that the list club, dagger, and sword could
be interpreted as those are the only weapons you could use to backstab with, but
I don't think so.  The list probably serves only as examples, and should incluce
other weapons used by thieves, and assassins.
	Another thing- it is true that thieves or assassins could make better use
of their abilities by attacking from nearby, or in the case of the assassin make
an assassination roll.  But this is not always the case.  For a low level assassin,
the chance to hit could far exceed the chance to assassinate and be just as deadly.
For the low level thief, it may be that croodling up on a victim is too difficult
because of a difficult move silently roll.  A missile weapon is the alternative
available.  This is often the case with lower level characters--they have to use
different tactics than higher level characters to make the best of their situations.

					from the world of Kemen
					Paul Pavlidis

dave@uwvax.ARPA (08/17/84)

Let's not forget that the PH and DMG are *guidelines*, not laws (it wouldn't
be fun if they were laws, now would it?).  If it makes sense to allow
the backstab concept for throwing (it does to me), then allow it.  If you
want to decrease damage/to-hit for the throw vs. direct attack, then do it.
If you add a new weapon, are you going to exclude it from being used in
backstabbing (assuming you allow the thief to use it) just because the PH
doesn't mention it?

In any case, if you and group you game with decide to allow using a sling,
etc. in a 'backstab' attack, then you are following the rules, because you
make the rules, and your GM enforces them.  Guidelines are just that,
guidelines.

-- 
Dave Cohrs @ wisconsin
...!{allegra,heurikon,ihnp4,seismo,ucbvax,uwm-evax}!uwvax!dave
dave@wisc-rsch.arpa

faustus@ucbvax.UUCP (Wayne Christopher) (08/19/84)

If a thief is to get a bonus for backstabbing with a thrown
weapon, he should be very good with the thrown weapon.  If he is
standing in back of someone, it is not difficult to aim where
the dagger is going to go in, and because he is a thief, he
knows where best to put it. But regardless of whether he knows
where to place an arrow, can he actually hit that particular
point? He would have to be quite a marksman to be able to do
this consistently. I think because of this, backstab bonus
should be restricted to those weapons that can actually be aimed
easily, i.e. handheld weapons (and maybe high-powered rifles
with telescopic sights).

	Wayne