[net.math] N-dimensional numbers?

phil@hlexa.UUCP (Phil Fleming) (02/23/84)

J.F. Adams, an algebraic topologist, proved (around 1962) that if
n-dimensional Euclidean space has an operation (henceforth called *)
satisfying;

(1) continuity in the arguments

(2) if x*y=0 then x=0 or y=0

then n=1,2,4 or 8. These operations can be realized by

n=1    Ordinary real number multiplication.

n=2    Pairs of real numbers (called complex numbers)
       with (a,b)*(c,d)=(ac - bd, ad + bc).

n=4    Pairs of complex numbers (called quaternions)
       with (a,b)*(c,d)=(ac - b(d_), ad + b(c_) ).
       Here, _ denotes complex conjugation.

n=8    Pairs of quaternions (called Cayley numbers)
       with (a,b)*(c,d)=( ac - b(d_), ad + b(c_) ).
       Here, _ denotes quaternionic conjugation
       (a,b)_ = ( a_ , -b ) (where a,b are complex
       numbers.

You could of course continue this process to get an
operation on 16-dimensional space but it would not
satisfy property (2). The importance of prop(2) is that
it makes division a well defined operation. As a final remark
note that the quaternions are not commutative and the Cayley
numbers are not associative ( (xy)z != x(yz) ).

Reference: J.F. Adams, Vector-fields on Speres, Bull.AMS,68:39-41 (1962).



                                Phil Fleming
                                AT&T Bell Laboratories
                                Short Hills, NJ

sonnens@mprvaxa.UUCP (Dan Sonnenschein) (02/23/84)

There are also "8-dimensional" numbers called Cayley numbers, after the
prominent 19th-century mathematician Arthur Cayley.  This number system
is non-associative as well as non-commutative.

Dan Sonnenschein, ...uw-beaver!ubc-vision!mprvaxa!sonnens

liberte@uiucdcs.UUCP (liberte ) (03/06/84)

#R:hlexa:-134600:uiucdcs:28200032:000:266
uiucdcs!liberte    Mar  5 22:38:00 1984

A generalized extension to complex numbers has been done by Charles Muses.
I forget how far he has gone with it, but 8 levels sounds about right.
So 16, 32 and 64 dimensional numbers are conceivable.  At each hier level,
more properties drop out.

Daniel LaLiberte