[net.math] n! not a square.

phil@hlexa.UUCP (Phil Fleming) (03/26/84)

It seems to me that a COMPLETE solution to a problem should
include references for nonobvious theorems used in the solution.
Simply giving a name to a result or saying you forget names of
theorems is clearly insuffient.

I am, of course referring to the statement;

Theorem: For any prime p, there is another prime q such that p<q<2p .

Does anyone have a reference for the proof of this?


				Phil Fleming