[net.cycle] Water vs. Air cooled

ron@hpfcmt.UUCP (ron) (04/16/85)

Re: Why water-cooled ??

Water cooling has a tremendous number of advantages in the longevity
area. A properly designed and maintained system can allow tighter tolerance
parts and a steadier operating temperature thus leading to better performance
and less thermal stress on the machine.

First, performance. Higher compression
ratios typically mean higher output from the machine for the same displacement
and weight. Part of the difficulty with higher compression (or turbocharging
for that matter) is increased combustion chamber temperatures. There are numerous ways of dealing with the problem ranging from water vapor injection, to 
inter-cooling, to sodium-filled valves to more exotic materials. Still, the
root problem is that a great deal of heat must be removed under a wide variety
of conditions. Liquid cooling has a long history of doing this very well.
Admittedly some tricks with oil sprays and oil cooling can help but the
water jacket around the cylinder head is a life-saver for some hot parts.

Second, longevity. A steady state operating condition is conducive to the
longest engine life (makes intuitive sense). Liquid cooling has the ability
to establish and maintain a steady state temperature (the biggest factor
in 'steady state') under conditions ranging from the design upper air temperature assumption (probably around 100 F) down to below freezing. The point here
being that engine operating temperature can be held constant while the 
outside air temperature can vary quite significantly. For an air-cooled 
engine this is absolutely not true. The engine temperature (cylinder head
temp) will vary with: power output, airflow over the engine, RPM, outside
air temperature and the amount of dirt on the cooling fins. Given that
airflow changes with speed and outside temperature changes with time of day
and season then the air cooled engine is operating in anything BUT steady
state. (As a specially stressful case consider what happens when riding
on a hot summer day -say 95 F- into a summer shower. The cylinder head may
be running around 200=>250 or more in the hot air and then receives a quenching
of 50 degree water spray when you ride into the shower. It's a wonder that
there aren't more  cracked cylinder heads occurring out there !)
Airplane engines typically have their overhaul intervals reduced by such harsh
treatment like this and are not very different from motorcycle engines.

So, those are some simple advantages.

There are disadvantages to water cooling too.
1. Increased complexity of the design due to the plumbing,pumping etc
2. Pumping losses due to the necessity to force water circulation.
3. Increased maintenance of the cooling system. (Change and flush coolant
   frequently for best results)
4. Lengthened warmup time due to the higher specific heat capacity of the
   engine. It takes longer to heat the metal-plus-water combination than the
   metal-only combination the operating range (This is the highest wear regime
   of the engine temp range => warmup)


So, what's the best choice ? Naturally, that depends.  Touring machines 
are commonly water cooled these days because their owners want and expect
very long life (relative to motorcycles) and are willing to put up with
the disadvantages to gain this. Banzai riders traditionally rode air
cooled machines because the weight just wasn't worth it. (And besides,
who ever heard of getting 75,000 miles out of a machine ridden so hard ?)

The picture is becoming less clear now that machines like the Ninja 900
and the V65 Sabre are around. But the trend seems to be that water cooling
is getting to be lighter in weight (with careful design) and so these
'performance' machines are utilizing the advantages of water cooling in
their design.  It's actually quite amazing. My 1982 air-cooled,chain
drive CB900F actually weighs MORE than a friend's 1984 water cooled,
shaft drive V65 Sabre. The bikes are intended for about the same type
riding and yet the bike with the 'heavier' features  weighs less.
If I had to choose right now between the two obviously the Sabre would 
be my choice. No chain, no fuss. Water cooled, longer life. What 
more could you want ?

Ron Miller
H-P
Ft. Collins Systems Div.
Ft. Collins Colo.

at: ... ihnp4!hpfcla!ron-m