williams@psuvax.UUCP (Lance Williams) (04/23/84)
I couldn't find a solution for Pell's equation with d = 961 but for d = 991
the solution is:
x = 379516400906811930638014896080 and y = 12055735790331359447442538767
The program I used to solve it generates a sequence from which the solution
can be extracted. See p. 178 of Shank's "Solved and Unsolved Problems in
Number Theory". The program follows:
(defun pell (x &aux a1 oc c b op q p oq na nb nc np nq)
(setq a1 (fix (sqrt x)))
(setq oc x c 1 b 0 op 0 q 0 p 1 oq 1)
(do ((n 1 (1+ n)))
((and (evenp (1- n)) (= c 1) (not (= n 1))) (list p q))
(setq na (fix (quotient (+ a1 b) c)))
(setq nb (difference (times na c) b))
(setq nc (plus oc (times na (difference b nb))))
(setq np (plus op (times na p)))
(setq nq (plus oq (times na q)))
(setq oc c op p oq q c nc b nb q nq p np)))
Who says lisp isn't useful for number crunching?
Lance Williams
Pennsylvania State Universitykp@smu.UUCP (04/27/84)
#R:psuvax:-102500:smu:14100003:000:339
smu!kp Apr 27 15:01:00 1984
It is rather surprising that your algorithm did not take care of
special case: if "d" is a perfect square then there are no solutions
in positive integers for the Pell's equation!
- KP -
Dept of Computer Science
(Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX)