williams@psuvax.UUCP (Lance Williams) (04/23/84)
I couldn't find a solution for Pell's equation with d = 961 but for d = 991 the solution is: x = 379516400906811930638014896080 and y = 12055735790331359447442538767 The program I used to solve it generates a sequence from which the solution can be extracted. See p. 178 of Shank's "Solved and Unsolved Problems in Number Theory". The program follows: (defun pell (x &aux a1 oc c b op q p oq na nb nc np nq) (setq a1 (fix (sqrt x))) (setq oc x c 1 b 0 op 0 q 0 p 1 oq 1) (do ((n 1 (1+ n))) ((and (evenp (1- n)) (= c 1) (not (= n 1))) (list p q)) (setq na (fix (quotient (+ a1 b) c))) (setq nb (difference (times na c) b)) (setq nc (plus oc (times na (difference b nb)))) (setq np (plus op (times na p))) (setq nq (plus oq (times na q))) (setq oc c op p oq q c nc b nb q nq p np))) Who says lisp isn't useful for number crunching? Lance Williams Pennsylvania State University
kp@smu.UUCP (04/27/84)
#R:psuvax:-102500:smu:14100003:000:339 smu!kp Apr 27 15:01:00 1984 It is rather surprising that your algorithm did not take care of special case: if "d" is a perfect square then there are no solutions in positive integers for the Pell's equation! - KP - Dept of Computer Science (Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX)