[net.math] Interesting Numbers in prison

colonel@gloria.UUCP (George Sicherman) (05/08/84)

[If this sentence is true then the Bug does not exist.]

Right, but that's not the Prisoner's Dilemma, it's the Unexpected
Hanging Paradox.  The Prisoner's Dilemma is the two-player game
where the prisoner goes free if he impeaches his partner, but only
if his partner does not impeach him.
-- 
Col. G. L. Sicherman
...seismo!rochester!rocksvax!sunybcs!gloria!colonel

gwyn@brl-vgr.UUCP (05/09/84)

Oops.  I believe you are right; I had forgotten the name of the
Paradox of the Unexpected Hanging and "Prisoner's Dilemma" came to
mind.  The paradoxes do have some similarities...

On the real Prisoner's Dilemma:  Years ago there was a Scientific
American article by Anatol Rapoport (spelling?) on a similar
"paradox" in 2-player, non-zero-sum game theory.  I think it is
really the same as the PD:

table of outcomes (A,B):

			Player B
		strategy B1	strategy B2

strategy A1	(A-1,B-1)	(A11,B-2)
Player A
strategy A2	(A-2,B11)	(A10,B10)

The "paradox" is this:  Player A will select strategy A1 because
no matter what player B does, he gains more with strategy A1 than
with A2.  Similarly, player B will select strategy B1 as dominant.
Then the outcome is -1 for each player.  HOWEVER, reasons Rapoport,
a "higher" mode of game-theoretic reasoning would lead both players
to choose strategy 2, so that each would get a payoff of 10 rather
than -1.  His article was an attempt to explain this reasoning.

The quibble I have with that is that this was explicitly assumed
to be a NON-COOPERATIVE game, so that collaboration between the
players is not permitted.  I believe Rapoport was trying to get
IMPLICIT collaboration with his theory that called for socialist
reasoning even in a game under these conditions.  I would love to
play this game against him if he uses his suggested strategy!

I dropped my subscription to Scientific American because of their
preference for nice "liberal" lead articles like this one and the
several on global military & political strategy.  I got tired of
statements like "it would seem to be possible, however, ..." and
"although this would appear to be the case, future political
realities may ...".  Shades of the State Science Institute's
analysis of Rearden metal!