[net.rec.photo] novice query

laurir (06/27/82)

I can no longer accept the poor quality of the photos from my backpacking
trips.  These are made with a Kodak Instamatic using something-400-something
film.  Pictures shot in other than sunlight (Pacific NorthWest deep pine
forests) are exceptionally grainy and lacking of image, and even the "good"
shots don't blow up worth a hoot.
  Would one or more experts suggest a replacement?  I know how to focus
through-the-lens (learned on a Polaroid) but can't estimate distances.
I like color, ease of film changing, and flash ability, and split my shots
between wide panoramas and close (six feet) pictures.  All equipment should
be able to survive in a knapsack and backpack.  Lightweight is crucial.
  If there are interesting replies, I'll summarize.
    -- Andrew Klossner

G:strong (06/29/82)

The Pentax 110 has a good reputation locally and in the popular photo magazines.
It does offer full automation, interchangable lenses, and good quality - if you
don't need to enlarge the pictures too much (above 5x7?).
Another possibility, although much heavier, is the Canon AE-1 Programmed.
The programming is the same as the A-1 and that works quite well.  Canons
seem to be well built and the optics are excellent.  Prices are not too bad,
considering the quality.