[net.rec.photo] Enlargers

dpj (11/07/82)

It's nice to see some traffic in the photo newsgroup. While things are
jumping, I think I'll throw in a request for some general info.

I'm in the market for an enlarger. I don't yet do any color work, but I
think I probably will some day. Should I opt for the dichroic head right
off the bat, or get an enlarger which presents the option for future
conversion? And how about working with filters rather a dichroic head?
Is this a real pain?

Finally, does anyone have any recommendations for a good enlarger which
won't put me in hock?

			Dean Jagels
			mhtsa!dpj

wm (11/07/82)

I have an older Omega enlarger with a dichroic head.  I highly
recommend the color head if you can afford it.  Using filters
with color printing is a major pain, and the color head comes
in handy for polycontrast papers used in black & white (dial
a contrast!).  I've always been pleased with Omega enlargers,
though some people like the besslers with their dual rails
for stability.  If you get an Omega, get the extra long rail.
It is stronger and lets you really blow those negatives up.

		Wm Leler - UNC Chapel Hill

thomas (11/09/82)

Don't get one which you have to use gelatin filters with.  They're a
royal pain (not to mention that they fade after a while).
=Spencer

ark (11/10/82)

If you can still find one, buy a Durst A-300.  They have been discontinued
several years but someone may still have one around.  It is a 35-mm only
autofocus enlarger with Nikon optics and built like a rock.  Its only
disadvantages, as far as I can see, are no large format and you're limited
to 11x14 on the baseboard.  On the other hand, the autofocus works better
than I can focus by hand, it's very fast, incredibly solid, and the
prints are grain-sharp corner to corner.  Colorhead works well too.

tw (11/10/82)

#R:mhtsa:-24300:hp-pcd:7800008:000:604
hp-pcd!tw    Nov 10 11:09:00 1982

	Wm sums it up nicely; Omega's are nice except that they
	are sometimes a bit unstable.  Also (unless they've fixed this
	in the last couple of years) their negative carriers aren't very
	good.  Probably the best bet for a solid, inexpensive (relatively)
	enlarger is the Beseler 23C.  It is pretty rugged, very solid,
	and has a rail extender if you get off to big prints.  There are
	also a couple of nice color heads for it.  I have an ancient 23C
	with a cold light head which I like pretty well.

     Tw Cook [yes, everyone from Rice has a wierd name, except maybe steveg;
              right wm?]