[net.rec.photo] Query on best lens

jerryp@tekid.UUCP (06/09/83)

To shoot very small things, you'll want a tripod... to keep your camera steady.
If you're using a tripod, that means that time exposures shouldn't be a
problem (as long as you use a cable release for your shutter).

So, instead of buying a fancy lens, try some extension tubes with your normal
lens.  They fit between the camera body and your lens.  You'll have to use a
longer exposure time, but if you have an SLR camera, the built-in light meter
will take care of that.

Some of the new zoom/macro lenses aren't bad... but I wonder if you can find
one that'll give you the magnification you need, and sharpness as good as
extension tubes, without spending hundreds of $$$.

--Jerry Peek
  D.S. 39-285; Tektronix, Inc.; P.O. Box 500; Beaverton, OR 97077
  503/627-3124
uucp:	{ucbvax,decvax,chico,pur-ee,cbosg,ihnss}!tektronix!tekid!jerryp
CSnet:	tekid!jerryp@tektronix
ARPA:	tekid!jerryp.tektronix@rand-relay 

jrf@hp-pcd.UUCP (06/11/83)

#R:ihldt:-166500:hp-pcd:7800018:000:886
hp-pcd!jrf    Jun 10 09:15:00 1983



When choosing a lens, quality should be your greatest concern (not to mention
whether the lens is compatible - the mount - with your camera body).  I suggest
a macro lens: with some manufacturers this means the simple ability to focus on
close objects; with others theirs lens is optimized for close focusing (has to 
do with the moving lens elements).  For greatest quality I suggest the latter,
with fixed focal length.

Light will also (probably) be a problem, especially if you want to stop down farenough to get greatest depth of field.  A detachable flash and/or a flash with
bounce capability will help.  Some lens have flash rings on the end to solve
this problem (an example of this is the 200mm Medical Nikkor).

Also, use a tripod and remote triggering device.

(Another note on light: you may find reflectors useful for uniform subject
 coverage)

jrf