[net.rec.photo] Color balencing

avsdT:willett@avsdS.UUCP (10/12/83)

I am having some trouble in balencing and correcting color prints.  Does 
anyone have an idea of how to calculate the correct color for a given 
picture?

Some of the trouble I have that really is frustrating is the changing of
colors in a picture due to things like the setting sun, incandecent lights,
florecent lights, and such.

The big question is how does Kodak or other print processors calculate the 
correct color when there is no obvious reference?

All replys and ideas would be appreciated.

		Mike Willett

		

keesan@bbncca.ARPA (Morris Keesan) (10/14/83)

There are two standard ways for professional print processors to achieve color
balance.  If there is any skin in the picture, they can balance the picture so
that the skin areas match their preconceived notion of what Caucasian skin looks
like.  More commonly, and used almost exclusively in automatic processors, I
believe, they generate an average reading of the entire picture, either by
"scrambling" the picture with a diffuser or by taking a reading of the whole
frame with a more sophisticated color printing meter, and then print the picture
on the assumption that the average picture should have an average color balance
equal to an 18% gray card.  If you do your own printing, one thing which can be
useful is to carry an 18% gray card with you when your out shooting, and for
critical shots, or when you're going to be taking a lot of shots in the same
light conditions, take one shot with the gray card in the scene.  Then when
you're printing you can work out your balance by printing that negative, and
then print the rest of the frames in that group with the same settings.  You
may use an occasional extra negative this way, unless you can print that
negative with the gray card cropped out of the image, but film is cheap,
especially compared with the amount of paper and chemicals you might otherwise
use trying to find the right color balance.