[net.rec.photo] Opinions on 35-205mm zoom lenses

mike@dolqci.UUCP (Mike Stalnaker) (05/14/85)

	I own a Canon AE-1 with a 50mm f1.8 lens.  For about the last
year, I've been thinking about buying a couple of lenses (a zoom and a
wide angle, or some such combination.) Recently, I've seen a lens made
by quantaray, a 35-205mm, f3.5 (I think), With macro.  Does anyone have
any experience with this or another wide range (eg 3x to 2xx mm) lens?
If these are actually pretty good lenses, it would seem to me to be the
way to go for someone like me (read: Joe Novice, who uses the camera
maybe once or twice a month for whatever).  I will probably get a little
more involved as time goes on, so would like to get something that will
last.... Any comments would be Appricieated.  Also what can you folks
tell me about nikon's new 500mm mirror lens? 
 
-- 

  Mike Stalnaker  UUCP:{decvax!decuac,cbosgd,seismo}!dolqci!mike
		  AT&T:202-376-2593
		  USPS:601 D. St. NW, Room 7122, Washington, DC, 20213
		
		  "Never appeal to a man's better nature. He may not
		   have one. Appeal to his better interests instead"
						--Lazarus Long

yoonkim@sun.uucp (Yoon Kim) (05/17/85)

> 
> 	I own a Canon AE-1 with a 50mm f1.8 lens.  For about the last
> year, I've been thinking about buying a couple of lenses (a zoom and a
> wide angle, or some such combination.) Recently, I've seen a lens made
> by quantaray, a 35-205mm, f3.5 (I think), With macro.  Does anyone have
> any experience with this or another wide range (eg 3x to 2xx mm) lens?

Tamron's 35-210mm (f3.5) zoom gives me sharp results; and would pretty
much suit your taste.  The range from 135-210 is kinda sudden, but
that isn't causing me any trouble.  And this has 1:4 macro mode.

-- 
yOOn
Sun Microsystems, Inc./Mt. View, CA
{ihnp4|decvax|seismo}!sun!yoonkim