poli-sci@ucbvax.ARPA (10/15/84)
From: JoSH <JoSH@RUTGERS.ARPA> Poli-Sci Digest Mon 15 Oct 84 Volume 4 Number 93 "The illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer." --Henry Kissinger Contents: Homework Where is the bread buttered? Rubber baby buggy bumpers ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 5 Oct 1984 08:15:02-EDT From: sde@Mitre-Bedford Subject: Home Work Assuming that work is paid by the piece, whether for knitting or data entry, who cares how many strokes are used? Monitoring thus is totally unnecessary. David sde@mitre-bedford ------------------------------ Date: Mon Oct 8 22:38:05 1984 From: mclure@sri-prism Subject: where your bread is buttered I find it most amusing that so many of these young, liberal, whipper-snappers at colleges and universities are always so pro-Democrat no matter how idiotic the Democratic candidate and his party's platform. The amusement is not in the above statement. Rather, it is in what happens to them many years later. Some subset of them will make it to the big-time and get excellent salaries. Then, they get to see closeup up to 50% of their salary being siphoned off their paycheck. Do they ever change their tune then! They see their paycheck vanishing, their being unable to give their families what they want, and boy do they do an about-face! The Republicans have been the only major party to say that taxing people at such rates is wrong. It is especially wrong to then take that money and give it to some welfare mother who just keeps having more and more illegitimate babies. Stuart ------------------------------ Date: Mon Oct 8 22:49:08 1984 From: mclure@sri-prism Subject: 3 predictions First prediction: Reagan will be re-elected in a landslide. Second prediction: Reagan will apply the full anti-FDR anti-New-Deal thrust that this country has needed for 50 years. Remember that FDR wanted to dismantle much of the New Deal but he died before he had the chance. Keynesian economics, in my mind, is pretty much discredited now. Third prediction: We will not see the full effects of Reagan's changes for up to 10 years after they are put in force. Just as FDR's implementation of Keynesian 'deficit spending' took 50 years to bring this country to the nadir of the Carter economic disaster, so will the Reagan anti-FDR take many years to fully show its effect. Stuart [If I may comment: (p.1.) I tend to agree. (p.2.) It ain't that easy. The Republicans probably won't get control of the House. The polity has come to regard its transfer payments as rights, and has become sophisticated enough to defend them tenaciously. The new right may be able to slow the process, but the inherent instability in the political process will ultimately win out. It may interest you that major economic think-tanks (eg Wharton) are beginning to predict high inflation, even if Reagan wins. (p.3.) FDR was really just the first break into the limelight of socialist ideas which had been gaining strength from the turn of the century. However, the 50 years since have been a tale of continued political expansion of those programs -- they didn't just happen once and then take their effect half a century later. Reagan is very much a corresponding break into the political limelight; but it will take another 50 years of constant political pressure to get a sane government-- and it won't happen. --JoSH] ------------------------------ Date: Thursday, 11 October 1984 23:47:36 EDT From: Hank.Walker@cmu-cs-unh.arpa Subject: advertising big bumpers A while back, a discussion on regulation touched on the fact that most auto manufacturers cut their bumper quality when regulation was lifted. But Ford has not, and advertises the fact that its cars qualify for lower insurance rates because of this. I just saw a rather amusing TV commercial for Escort, showing it bounce off of cars, and trucks, and then bump into a building with a cut to a building being dynamited. So companies don't always do the stupid thing. But after reading Iaccoca's Autobiography exerpt, I'm probably never going to buy a Ford again (I own one). ------------------------------ End of POLI-SCI Digest - 30 - -------