poli-sci@ucbvax.ARPA (04/18/85)
From: JoSH <JoSH@RUTGERS.ARPA> Poli-Sci Digest Thu 18 Apr 85 Volume 5 Number 14 Contents: Car Wars Star Wars ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 85 22:06:11 pst From: upstill%ucbdegas@Berkeley (Steve Upstill) Subject: RailCars I'd like to put in my approval of JoSH's idea for rail cars by pointing out a significant advantage of the proposal: incrementality. The idea is that wholesale, consensual, cooperative change is unlikely in the absence of the following conditions: -- users of the old method can continue to use it -- the extent of the change is proportional to the number of people endorsing it. -- using the new method is reasonable even in the absence of a complete changeover, the new method wins. -- users of the new method can continue to use the old method. The reason these conditions are necessary is that, if the success of a move depends on everybody cooperatively making the same move, then nobody will go first. The only amendment to JoSH's plan is to introduce convertible cars: once the rail line runs out, they can run on regular streets. The plan has an obvious, profitable first step: commute corridors. I live a few miles from a major corridor to San Francisco which is reliably choked with commute traffic. Imagine the salutory effect on these drivers of watching RailCars zooming by overhead (I already know the salutory effect of them watching cars zoom by in the carpool lane: they stop at bus stops to pick up extra passengers). To spend even the zoom time reading, playing cards provides extra motivation. Once you have enough converted cars, then building lines to serve them becomes sensible and attractive. Eventually, cities will convert to installing RailCar lines rather than paving street, assuming the former is cheaper, providing still more motivation to convert. Anyway, what I'm saying is that it is a major point in its favor that JoSH's plan doesn't depend for its viability on people converting from one transport system to another, wholesale. The conversion could be quite elegant and speedy, under the right conditions. Steve U. [Thanks for the vote of confidence--My friends and I who dreamed it up (one of whom is an engineer with the NJ Dept of Trans, of all things) just like to kick ideas like this around as mental recreation. I really do think this one could work under the right circumstances...--JoSH] ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 17 Apr 85 11:30 pst From: "diverse-diaz desiree%c.mfenet"@LLL-MFE.ARPA Subject: Strategic Defense Initiative Thoughts, anyone ? This is being discussed now ( to a limited extent ) in SF-LOVERS. I haven't formed a definite opinion yet. Desiree' [Let me interject a butinsky remark first: please don't send any political-type arguments of the form "SDI is good (bad); it will (not) work; it is (un)stabilizing; etc" since that is going on at great length on the ARMS-D list where you are welcome to read it. It would be of great interest to speculate on, for example, the possible effects of such things on the nation-state organization of the world political system (it was not always thus and won't always be thus). Could a pre-eminence of defense over offense cause a re-emergence of the feudal system? --JoSH] ------------------------------ End of POLI-SCI Digest - 30 - -------