[net.bugs.2bsd] pwhash

dove@mit-dspg@mit-mc (06/15/82)

From: dove at mit-dspg at mit-mc
At what point does it pay to use it?  I have a 5600b passwd file,
~100 entries.  I built a ls with pwhash and found it slower than without.
Is there a better test of pwhashing?

william (06/28/82)

I suspect you did not install pwhash exactly correct, since your entry
search time should be noticably shorter, dropping from a worst case 100
to 2-3 entries. Perhaps it is always failing on the hashed search, then
defaulting to the linear?

	Bill.

Physics:crl (06/30/82)

I myself recently tried the pwhash code on a passwd of about 170 
entries and it ended up running (I think) about 50% slower. (I
used 'ls' as a benchmark.)

Charles LaBrec
pur-ee!physics:crl

ARPAVAX:feldman (07/01/82)

When we originally wrote the pwhash code at Berkeley, we were running on
a system with about 1500 entries in /etc/passwd.  The speedup was very
noticable.  I wouldn't be surprised if for (relatively) small passwd files
pwhash didn't help.
			Steve Feldman,
			formerly of EECS 11/70 system support group