john@genrad.UUCP (John Nelson) (11/01/84)
For some reason this article got put into "junk" at this site instead of
the correct newsgroup. We are running news 2.10.2, with the "fixed" rn
inews patch. The article seems to come from notes somewhere, but the
header looks fine to me! Has anyone seen this before, and is there a fix?
Relay-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site genrad.UUCP
Posting-Version: notesfiles
Path: genrad!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!acf4!greenber
From: greenber@acf4.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Bicycle Pump Enema
Message-ID: <9700006@acf4.UUCP>
Date: 17 Oct 84 14:28:00 GMT
Date-Received: 1 Nov 84 00:39:53 GMT
References: <3886@dec-kirk.UUCP>
Organization: New York University
Lines: 6
Nf-ID: #R:dec-kirk:-388600:acf4:9700006:000:100
Nf-From: acf4!greenber Oct 17 09:28:00 1984crl@pur-phy.UUCP (Charles LaBrec) (11/04/84)
In article <465@genrad.UUCP> john@genrad.UUCP (John Nelson) writes: >For some reason this article got put into "junk" at this site instead of >the correct newsgroup. We are running news 2.10.2 .... > Date: 17 Oct 84 14:28:00 GMT > Date-Received: 1 Nov 84 00:39:53 GMT Note that Date-Received is > Date + 14 days, which is the default expiration period. I believe the new version throws such "old" articles into junk. Charles LaBrec UUCP: pur-ee!Physics:crl, purdue!Physics:crl INTERNET: crl @ pur-phy.UUCP
avolio@grendel.UUCP (Frederick M. Avolio) (11/05/84)
> For some reason this article got put into "junk" at this site instead of > the correct newsgroup. We are running news 2.10.2, with the "fixed" rn > inews patch. The article seems to come from notes somewhere, but the > header looks fine to me! Has anyone seen this before, and is there a fix? > > Relay-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site genrad.UUCP > Posting-Version: notesfiles > Path: genrad!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!acf4!greenber > From: greenber@acf4.UUCP > Newsgroups: net.singles > Subject: Re: Bicycle Pump Enema > Message-ID: <9700006@acf4.UUCP> > Date: 17 Oct 84 14:28:00 GMT > Date-Received: 1 Nov 84 00:39:53 GMT > References: <3886@dec-kirk.UUCP> > Organization: New York University > Lines: 6 > Nf-ID: #R:dec-kirk:-388600:acf4:9700006:000:100 > Nf-From: acf4!greenber Oct 17 09:28:00 1984 Perhaps you should look at the news log file. Also the errlog file. I suspect you will see a line which says inews: Article too old, moved to junk as the articles is dated 14 days (2*WEEK) before the ate it arrived. Probably that is your default time limit... -- Fred Avolio, DEC -- U{LTR,N}IX Support 301/731-4100 x4227 UUCP: {seismo,decvax}!grendel!avolio ARPA: grendel!avolio@seismo
chuqui@nsc.UUCP (Zonker T. Chuqui) (11/08/84)
In article <191@grendel.UUCP> avolio@grendel.UUCP (Frederick M. Avolio) writes: >Perhaps you should look at the news log file. Also the errlog file. I >suspect you will see a line which says > > inews: Article too old, moved to junk > >as the articles is dated 14 days (2*WEEK) before the ate it arrived. >Probably that is your default time limit... This is one reason why one of the first things I did was patch inews to move these things to a group called 'obsolete' instead of junk. I passed the change to rick, it may be in the next release, but it does make it easier for me to track down bad articles without tripping on the old ones... chuq -- From the Department of Bistromatics: Chuq Von Rospach {cbosgd,decwrl,fortune,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo}!nsc!chuqui nsc!chuqui@decwrl.ARPA I'd know those eyes from a million years away....