brad@gcc-milo.ARPA (Brad Parker) (07/28/86)
My first attempt to patch rn with patch #29 failed. I found I
had to back out the changes and reapply them with the "-l" (loose)
option.
It appears that the diffs had slightly different leading spaces?
(this is just me anal-retentivenes worrying about having the use
the -l option from now on, because of one little slip)
Is this just me?
ps: thanks to whom ever posted patch #28. It worked fine.
--
J Bradford Parker
General Computer (HyperDrive Beach, 3rd Cabana)
harvard!gcc-milo!brad
Good Sex is easier than a good slow roll. ("Left Stick! Right Rudder!...")greg@ncr-sd.UUCP (Greg Noel) (07/29/86)
In article <622@gcc-milo.ARPA> brad@gcc-milo.UUCP (Brad Parker) writes: >My first attempt to patch rn with patch #29 failed. I found I >had to back out the changes and reapply them with the "-l" (loose) >option. >Is this just me? It's not just you -- I had to do it, too. But thanks for the reminder about the "-l" option -- I was about to do the patches by hand....... -- -- Greg Noel, NCR Rancho Bernardo Greg@ncr-sd.UUCP or Greg@nosc.ARPA