jgpo@iwu1c.UUCP (John, KA9MNK) (03/09/84)
(CLEAR!) Has anyone out there had any experience with requesting a waiver of vision requirements for a Second Class medical? I managed to get my Third Class with no problems, but I might want a Second in the future so I can get my Commercial. SPECIFICS: Vision in both eyes 20/400 minus (Chart?? What chart???) Both eyes correctable to 20/20 I wear my glasses ALL the time Vision has been stable for the past 5 years Vision had improved slightly at my last checkup (last year) I have no other visual disturbances; just the myopia When I asked the doctor at my Third Class examination, he hemmed and hawed a bit and then told me that I could always get an instrument rating. When I pressed him for an answer, he told me I could apply for a waiver, but not to hold my breath. Any ideas? Thanks in advance, John Opalko AT&T Bell Labs {whatever}!ihnp4!iwu1c!jgpo
nathanm@hp-pcd.UUCP (03/19/84)
[] Despite the total lack of evidence that wearing visual aids has *ever* caused an accident, the rules live on. I recall reading somewhere that the FAA will be investigating the subject, so things may change in our lifetimes. Or perhaps those of the next generation. Like you, I suffer from 20/400- myopia. At my first aviation physical, for reasons I never understood, the doctor made me remove my contact lenses and look at the chart. "Can you see the E on the top line? It's OK to squint." So I squinted until I scrunched my face into a tiny little ball. "Yes," I concluded, "it's an E." Of course, this was a third class physical. The one treatment I know of that is often used by airline pilots is orthokeratology. In this treatment, your lenses are slowly reshaped with a series of contact lenses (through selective oxygen starvation, I once heard) until you attain 20/20-hood. After treatment, you need to wear retainer lenses for a few hours a week... otherwise your good vision will slowly slip away. Since this slipping away takes months instead of seconds (unlike dropping glasses or popping contact lenses), the FAA considers it acceptable. If you're really impatient, you might consider radial keratotomy, the surgical counterpart to orthokeratology. It's still pretty new in this country and I don't think the long-term effects are understood. But you could be the first on your block. While I'm at it, maybe I'll suggest an answer to the question I started out to address: I wouldn't bet a dime on your chances of getting a waiver. Sorry. ---- Nathan Meyers {hplabs,allegra!harpo}!hp-pcd!nathanm